American Express gives money for Route 66 preservation

American Express, in conjunction with the World Monuments Fund, announced today it was giving $150,000 for an economic study to help sustain historic Route 66.

Excerpts from the news release:

This initiative, which is part of the American Express Partners in Preservation initiative launched in 2006, is focused on sustaining historic sites in the face of increased visitor activities and environmental impacts, and preserving them for future generations to enjoy. […]

“As members of a global community, we need to understand the impact that our collective footprint has on the wear and tear of heritage sites. Preservation and public education go hand-in-hand,” said Bonnie Burnham, president of the World Monuments Fund. “We are delighted to be working with our longtime partner American Express, and helping, through the Partners in Preservation program, not only to preserve these sites but also to educate both tourists and the local communities about the role they can play in conserving their irreplaceable heritage.” […]

The grant distribution is as follows:

Historic Route 66, cities, towns and villages between Chicago and Los Angeles – $150,000 for an in-depth economic study of this long-distance historic corridor. The study will provide information for communities that can be used to stimulate heritage tourism at local, state and national levels in the effort to preserve the corridor in its entirety and ensure its long-term sustainability. Funding will also contribute to a comprehensive survey of the many different buildings and attractions that make up this unique landscape and the impact that environmental factors and modern travel have had on them. This effort will include a conservation assessment of the historic Santo Domingo Trading Post site on Route 66 in New Mexico. Once a trading center for Native American arts and crafts and a popular stopping point for travelers, the Trading Post was damaged by fire in the early 2000’s and is now left vacant. The project will make recommendations on the building’s restoration and future use. Route 66 was placed on World Monuments Fund’s Watch List of 100 Most Endangered Sites in 2008. 

Other grant recipients were St. Paul’s Cathedral in London, Delhi Heritage City in India, and the Mexico City Historical Center.

This is an encouraging development. As American Express notes: “During the first ten years of the Watch program, American Express contributed more than $10 million to help preserve 126 historic sites in 62 countries from the World Monuments Watch List of the 100 Most Endangered Sites.”

So the World Monuments Fund’s listing of Route 66 as an endangered historical site already has paid dividends. And when one big corporation kicks in money, others usually follow.

2 thoughts on “American Express gives money for Route 66 preservation

  1. Ron,

    Can I play devil’s advocate for a moment?

    First of all, ANY money being spent for ANYTHING positive on Rte.66 is a good thing.

    But I really wish AmEX had made that $150k donation directly to some of the existing Rte.66 organizations.

    Do we really need a comprehensive study of Rte.66 historic sites? Just about every state has one, if not several, Rte.66 groups. I’m pretty sure without doing much more than reading this site they could have gotten any number of great ideas on how to better invest that $150k, and make a REAL impact.

    This WMF group keeps offices on Madison Ave. in New York city. That has to be a substantial expense. Bonnie Burnham, quoted above, makes almost a quarter of a million dollars year in salary from the WMF. Good for her, but again, this is one of (I count 28 listed on their website) employees, that all represent dollars NOT spent on actual preservation.

    Their percentage of money spent on actual projects Vs. income (86%) doesn’t look too bad. But I read stories here about preservation projects done with volunteers, donated materials, and absolute shoe string budgets…It just seems like the money could be better spent.

    I’m sure I’m missing the point here, and know you have been around Rte.66 issues for a long time. Can you enlighten me a little on the benefits of this kind of study? Does the result of this study mean that at least one, if not several, Rte.66 sites will be selected by this group for preservation work ( and funds) in the future?

    Thanks.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.